#TrumpVetoesCBDCBill

Trump Didn't Veto the CBDC Ban. The Clause Did. #TrumpVetoesCBDCBill Trump cancelled the signing of a bill that included a CBDC ban through 2030. Same guy who's publicly called a digital dollar a threat to financial freedom. Markets read it as a U-turn. It isn't. He's holding the bill hostage to get an unrelated elections measure, the SAVE AMERICA ACT, passed first. Classic legislative leverage. The CBDC ban itself cleared the House 358-32 and the Senate 85-5, well above veto-proof margins. Under US law, it becomes law automatically after 10 days if he neither signs nor vetoes it while Congress is in session. The ban is likely going through regardless. What's actually worth watching is the parallel debate on Fed master accounts. Congress is weighing whether crypto and fintech firms should get direct access to the Fed's payment rails via so-called "skinny accounts." The Fed published its formal rulemaking in May; public comments close July 27. If this clears, it would reshape crypto's payment infrastructure far more than any CBDC ban ever could. The real signal: even under a crypto-friendly administration, legislation doesn't move clean. Clause-level politics slow things down. But the direction hasn't reversed. It's just friction in the details. Bigger question: which matters more for crypto's long-term footing in the US, blocking CBDCs, or getting direct access to Fed payment rails? Share your thoughts in the comments 👇 $BTC $SPCX $USDT

On Trump and the CBDC Veto #TrumpVetoesCBDCBill The veto is a defining moment for financial sovereignty versus state control. The veto isn't about a digital dollar. It's about who gets to architect the rails. A CBDC, in its purest government-issued form, isn't a currency upgrade. It's programmable sovereignty. The same infrastructure that enables instant settlement also enables programmable expiration, conditional spending, and real-time surveillance of every transaction. That's not a conspiracy theory. That's a design feature buried in every central bank white paper on the topic. Trump's veto signals something the crypto space rarely acknowledges: the battle lines aren't between parties. They're between control and permissionlessness. The overlooked implication: a CBDC ban in the US doesn't kill the technology. It pushes it underground and offshore. Stablecoins become the default public-private compromise. Privacy chains become the escape valve. And the Fed's research doesn't stop—it rebrands. The real question no one is asking: if the US formally rejects a CBDC, does that make dollar-pegged stablecoins the de facto digital dollar? And if so, who governs them? Circle and Tether don't have Congressional oversight. But they might get it faster than anyone expects. This isn't a win for crypto maximalists. It's an opening move in a much longer negotiation about what digital money looks like—and who controls the kill switch. Not financial advice. A structural observation on the politics of programmable money. $SOL $NES $H

#TrumpVetoesCBDCBill TRUMP’S CBDC DECISION JUST REMINDED CRYPTO OF ONE THING: POLITICS MOVES SLOWER THAN NARRATIVES Many expected a clear signal against CBDCs. Instead, Trump’s refusal to sign a bill containing a CBDC ban has added a new layer of uncertainty to an already complex regulatory landscape. At first glance, the market saw a contradiction. A politician who has repeatedly criticized CBDCs chose not to approve legislation that included a CBDC restriction. But the deeper story may not be about support or opposition to digital currencies at all. It may be about priorities. Analysts suggest the decision reflects broader negotiations surrounding crypto market structure, fintech access to Federal Reserve infrastructure, and the long-term framework that could shape digital finance in the United States. For crypto investors, this is a reminder that adoption is not determined by headlines alone. Regulation is often built through compromise, and compromise rarely arrives in a straight line. The most interesting development is not what was blocked today. It’s what policymakers are still debating behind the scenes: who gets access to the future financial system, how digital assets integrate with traditional banking, and what role blockchain technology will ultimately play in global payments. My view is that this headline is larger than CBDCs. It highlights the growing reality that crypto is no longer fighting for attention—it is fighting for a place inside the financial architecture of the world’s largest economy. Markets react to price. History remembers policy. #TrumpVetoesCBDCBill $TRUMP $BTC $ETH @OKX中文 @OKX星球 @OKX Orbit

#TrumpVetoesCBDCBill: The Man Who Banned CBDCs By Executive Order Just Refused to Sign the Bill That Would Have Made It Law. The irony is almost too clean to believe. The 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act passed the Senate 85-5 and the House 358-32 — both veto-proof margins. It included the first statutory ban in US history on a Federal Reserve-issued digital dollar, prohibiting any CBDC through December 31, 2030, while explicitly protecting stablecoins that are "open, permissionless, and private." Trump was scheduled to sign it in a ceremony at the US Capitol on June 24. He cancelled the event one hour before it was set to begin. Crypto News His condition: Congress must first pass the SAVE America Act, a voter-ID and proof-of-citizenship bill that the Senate rejected 48-50 on June 4 — just three weeks earlier, with four Republicans joining every Democrat in opposition. Trump declared the housing bill "of minor importance" and demanded the legislature deliver something it had already voted down. FinancialContent The constitutional math means the CBDC ban will likely become law anyway. Under the Constitution, a bill presented to the president becomes law automatically after 10 days if he neither signs nor vetoes it — provided Congress remains in session. Both chambers passed it by margins far exceeding the two-thirds threshold needed to override a veto. Coinmonitor The collateral damage is the more urgent story. The CLARITY Act needs a Senate floor vote before the August congressional recess — analysts say preferably by end of June, no later than end of July — to have a realistic chance of becoming law in 2026. Prediction market odds on CLARITY Act passage have already fallen from 74% to 42%. Every day of standoff over the housing bill consumes Senate calendar time the CLARITY Act cannot afford. CryptoSlate Trump is anti-CBDC. He signed the executive order. He refuses to sign the law. And in doing so, he may have handed the CLARITY Act its most dangerous obstacle yet: time. #TrumpVetoesCBDCBill

Worth getting the facts straight: Trump didn't formally veto anything, he canceled the signing ceremony for the bipartisan housing bill that carried a US CBDC ban, reportedly to pressure Congress on a separate elections bill. Net effect for now is the same: the CBDC prohibition is paused, with knock-on implications for the CLARITY Act riding alongside it. For crypto the symbolism cuts an odd way. Killing a CBDC is broadly what the industry wanted, but stalling the whole bill also delays the market-structure clarity everyone's been waiting on. BTC's at $61.7K, down 1.5%, treating this as noise for now. My read: bullish on the anti-CBDC signal, frustrating on the legislative delay. Net neutral until the bill actually moves. NFA, just my read. #TrumpVetoesCBDCBill #OKXOrbit

Trump Didn’t reject the CBDC ban. The process itself is creating the delay. Trump pulled back from signing a bill that included a CBDC ban through 2030, despite repeatedly calling a digital dollar a risk to financial freedom. Some interpreted it as a policy reversal, but the bigger picture suggests otherwise. The hold-up appears tied to legislative strategy. Reports indicate the administration wants movement on the SAVE AMERICA ACT before advancing the broader package. The CBDC provision itself already passed with overwhelming bipartisan support: 358–32 in the House and 85–5 in the Senate, numbers comfortably above veto-proof levels. Under current rules, if the president neither signs nor vetoes a bill while Congress remains in session, it can still become law after the required waiting period. What deserves more attention is the parallel debate around Fed master accounts. Congress is discussing whether crypto and fintech firms should gain direct access to the Federal Reserve payment system through so-called "skinny accounts." If approved, the impact on crypto infrastructure could be much larger than a CBDC ban itself. The larger takeaway: even in a crypto-friendly environment, legislation rarely moves in a straight line. Direction matters, but so does the friction created by the details. The bigger question remains: what matters more for crypto’s long-term future in the US — blocking CBDCs or opening direct access to Fed payment rails? $BTC $SPCX $USDT

🚨 JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Trump says he will not sign the housing bill, which temporarily bans CBDC, unless Congress passes the “SAVE America Act.” The delay could spill over and slow progress on the Crypto CLARITY Act.

ICYMI: Here's a quick news recap from today's Asia & EMEA sessions @TheBlockCo 👇 🏛️ The House of Representatives passed the anti-CBDC 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act with an overwhelming vote on Tuesday, sending it to President Donald Trump's desk. 🗳️ Adrian Boafo, a Maryland state delegate backed by the Protect Progress crypto PAC, won the Democratic primary on Tuesday. 🤝 BNB treasury firm CEA Industries entered into a cooperation agreement with YZi Labs, ending months-long governance disputes. 🚀 Cboe Global Markets launched the first binary options products in its new suite called Cboe Predicts. 📁 Voyager investors filed a notice of appeal challenging Judge Roy Altman's dismissal of claims against Mark Cuban and the Dallas Mavericks. 📨 U.S. law enforcement organizations sent a joint letter to the DOJ and the White House, warning of oversight gaps surrounding a key provision in the Clarity Act. 🇯🇵 Japan's SBI Group announced the official launch of its trust bank-backed stablecoin, JPYSC. 📈 21Shares said bitcoin's post-halving price action "still looks familiar," but sees a recovery toward $100,000 by the end of the year. 🏡 Black Lake and Nuva Labs completed what the firms described as the first onchain minting and transfer of $25 million in institutional mortgage loans on Provenance Blockchain. 🐙 Kraken-incubated Ethereum Layer 2 network Ink is upgrading to OP Enterprise Fully Managed in a multi-year deal. 📉 Rolling one-year notional flows across bitcoin investment vehicles fell to -1,176 BTC, the first negative reading since November 2023, according to K33.

#特朗普拒签CBDC法案 特朗普直接否决了那份住房法案。 该法案由两党共同推动，在众议院以358票赞成、32票反对，参议院以85票赞成、5票反对的超高票获得通过。 然而，到了特朗普这里，法案被搁置了。$BTC 他给出的理由十分直接：自己在房地产领域赚取了数十亿美元，对楼市的理解无人能及。 他认为，当前房价问题的根源在于利率过高。 其核心诉求只有一个——尽快降息。 他还表示，不会打压手中持有房产的普通民众，不希望大家的房产价值缩水。 但关键在于，这份法案中包含了一条币圈人士高度关注的条款。 该条款明确规定，美联储在2030年之前不得推出CBDC（央行数字货币）。 此前，圈内普遍将这一条款视为重大利好。 如今法案被搁置，这条利好条款也随之作废，相关预期未能落地。 特朗普坚持提出条件：国会需先通过他的《拯救美国选举法案》，他才愿意就住房法案进行协商。 再来关注市场盘面，BTC现价60814美元，最低跌至59000美元。 ETH现价1613美元，最低跌至1552美元。 小盘币种BEAT表现走弱，下跌3.46%。 BTC的爆仓数据反映出市场资金分歧显著。 24小时内爆仓总额达4亿美元，其中多单爆仓3.2亿美元，空单爆仓8363万美元。 12小时累计爆仓3.9亿美元，绝大多数是此前抄底的多单被清洗出局。 这波反弹仅为小幅修复，套牢盘的抛压仍然较重。 接下来谈谈对我们炒币的实际影响。 此前，不少人押注美国短期内不会推出CBDC，现在这一预期落空，市场失去了一项重要的政策支撑。 不过，特朗普反复呼吁降息，如果后续能够落地降息，市场流动性将得到放宽，这反而会对大饼（比特币）和以太坊构成利好。 目前政策陷入彻底僵局，监管及CBDC相关预期都变得模糊，市场盘面又增添了一层不确定因素。 市场本身刚经历一波大跌，即便BTC出现小幅反弹，多单爆仓规模依然居高不下。 在政策出现这种反转变数的情况下，操作务必保持保守。 不要重仓参与消息面驱动的行情$BTC $ETH #OKX星球话题来啦 #波动雷达：币种异动观察

特朗普拒签CBDC法案 说实话，看到这消息我第一反应是松了口气。 CBDC说白了就是央行数字货币，如果以后钱全部变成可追踪、可监控的数字美元，那传统加密货币的生存空间肯定会被压缩。 特朗普这次拒签相关法案，虽然更多是政治博弈，但至少释放出一个信号：美国内部对于CBDC推进依然存在巨大分歧。 目前全球稳定币总市值已经超过3000亿美元，光USDT市值就接近2000亿美元。相比政府直接发行数字美元，市场显然更愿意接受稳定币体系。 对于币圈来说，我觉得这事偏利好。因为真正威胁BTC和加密生态的，从来不是监管，而是官方亲自下场做“数字美元”。 短期可能影响不大，但长期看，如果美国继续压制CBDC、支持稳定币发展，那资金更有可能流向BTC、ETH以及整个加密市场。 至少目前来看，数字美元全面落地这件事，又被按下暂停键了。 #特朗普拒签CBDC法案