Publikuj

Here’s a more polished version that keeps the original thesis while making the argument sharper: $BTC I've been thinking about EIP-8361 and EIP-8363. $ETH Ethereum has been living with an interesting paradox: $SOL More staking strengthens network security, but that security has historically been subsidized through ongoing ETH issuance. A roughly 2% inflation rate may seem small, but over the long run, it represents a real economic cost — ultimately paid by ETH holders. From that perspective, gradually reducing issuance makes sense. But I think something bigger is happening. Over the past few years, Ethereum's security ecosystem has expanded far beyond the L1 itself. Restaking, re-restaking, liquid staking, and the broader staking economy have created their own network effects. Security is no longer dependent solely on L1 issuance. That changes the equation. In the long run, I think proposals like EIP-8361 and EIP-8363 could help restore a healthier balance between liquid ETH and staked ETH. The strongest staking protocols should survive because they provide genuine value and sustainable incentives, while weaker models naturally disappear. Validators will continue to evolve, but Ethereum may no longer need to rely on perpetual inflation as heavily to maintain a secure network. And that's the bigger signal to me. This isn't simply about reducing issuance. It's about Ethereum becoming confident enough to let its ecosystem carry more of the security burden — rather than relying on inflation alone. That could be a meaningful step toward a more sustainable Ethereum economy. 🟣 #CPIToResetFedBets #AIMemorySelloffEases #BTCETHETFInflowsReturn