帖子

趙.7
趙.7
查看原文
3. Enterprise Partnerships with Model Labs — Real Revenue or Vaporware? This is the core of Grass's narrative: "We have real revenue, not an air project." 33 million in annualized revenue sounds impressive, but you need to ask a few questions: Question Current Status Is the revenue independently audited? Self-reported by the team, no third-party audit Is revenue shared with token holders? Governance vote only proposed on July 7, not yet implemented Who are the clients? How long are the contracts? Specific AI lab names not disclosed Where does your 1.3 USDC come from? Not from that 33M revenue — it comes from token inflation/airdrop pools The brutal truth: Grass's business model is "B2B for revenue, B2C for token issuance." The USDC paid by AI labs goes into the project's pockets, while you receive ever-inflating GRASS tokens. This is the classic DePIN exploitation model — they monetize your bandwidth for real dollars and pay you in points and token promises.$GRASS
趙.7
趙.7
亲爱的Grass Foundation团队, 我是来自中国的用户,自第一季起参与Grass网络,运行节点已超过两年。首先,感谢您们第一季的奖励,这让我对项目的长期价值充满信心。 我个人赞同第二季以USDC发放奖励的决定。从代币补贴转向现金流驱动模式,标志着项目成熟的重要一步。 然而,关于奖励分配,我有一些担忧,希望团队能予以解答: - 总积分累计:13,302,902 - 实际收到奖励:1.3 USDC 坦率地说,这一结果与我过去两年的持续贡献严重不成比例。我理解奖励可能涉及带宽质量、节点稳定性和地理分布等因素,但作为长期贡献者,我希望了解: 1. 第二季USDC奖励的具体计算逻辑和权重分配是什么? 2. 积分与USDC之间的兑换率或标准如何确定? 3. 长期贡献者在奖励机制中是否享有权重加成? Grass仍处于早期阶段,未来还有许多工作要做。作为社区成员,我愿意与项目共同成长。期待7月7日的电话会议能为全球长期贡献者提供透明且详尽的答复。 如果会议未能充分澄清奖励机制,我将不得不重新评估我和我的社区对Grass网络的长期承诺。希望团队能认真对待长期贡献者的合理关切。$GRASS

免责声明:欧易星球内容仅供参考。 了解更多

回复

暂无评论,快来抢沙发!