
Post
àŒș đŽđ. đ±đđđđ àŒ»
đš $FWA LOOKS LIKE A CASINO â BUT THE NUMBERS ARE WHAT REALLY MATTER.
Hereâs the simple breakdown:
«Fake World Assets is basically an on-chain gacha machine built on ETH.»
You put in roughly 0.117 ETH for a random NFT position.
Then you have two choices:
đ° Keep the NFT you pulled
đ° Or sell it back for 85% of its ETH backing
And these arenât random junk NFTs either â the system can involve NFTs from major collections.
The interesting part?
Thereâs no NFT price oracle.
No floor-price feed. No external pricing mechanism.
The depositor sets the ETH backing, and that single number determines the sale price, selection odds, and stake.
But hereâs where it gets wild:
đČ Drawing has roughly -21% EV.
Across 1,981 real settlements, the average dump was around -18.1%.
Thatâs an incredibly heavy rake â and itâs openly disclosed in the docs.
LPing tells a different story:
đ Roughly +8.9% per cycle
đŒïž You keep your NFT about 94.5% of the time
But thereâs a catchâŠ
LPs are essentially taking a quiet short position on NFT floor prices.
And then thereâs the $FWA token.
Right now, it has zero value accrual.
Buybacks have paid out $0 since launch.
Meanwhile, emissions are running at 2% of total supply per day â and they're scheduled to end on August 4 at 19:01 UTC.
đ„ That date could be the real turning point.
Current protocol revenue is reportedly around $289K/day on day 7, which is roughly 2.3x Collector Crypt while sitting at just 11% of its valuation.
But here's the real question:
Can that revenue actually last after the emissions end?
Because if the revenue is sustainable, $FWA could get very interesting.
If it isn'tâŠ
The tokenomics could tell a completely different story.
$FWA đ
#DailyOrbit
Ansvarsfriskrivning: OKX Orbit-innehÄll tillhandahÄlls endast i informationssyfte. LÀs mer
Svar
Inga kommentarer Àn. Var den första att svara!
Dagens marknadsrykte
1#AIInfraEarningsWatch


2#CPIToResetFedBets

3#AIInfraFundingDiverges

