Publikuj

The $CORE community is flooded with a hot article titled "CORE is the severely underestimated 'biological son' of Bitcoin," a well-packaged BTCFi narrative attracting many retail investors to stop and take notice. Many newcomers are immediately tempted after reading it, firmly believing that now is the golden bottom-buying opportunity. Unpacking this marketing blind box, beneath the glossy promotional shell lie layers of carefully designed logical traps. First layer of packaging: Relying on Bitcoin's hash power, it has Bitcoin-level network security. The truth is a typical word game. Miner hash power delegation purely chases CORE token rewards, which is just a short-term business with no permanent binding. When profits decline, hash power can collectively withdraw at any time. Bitcoin's hash power does not provide security protection for CORE; the two public chains are independent. The so-called hash power moat is just a label for external hype. Many promotions deliberately confuse concepts, misleading investors to think that by leveraging BTC hash power, they have the same level of security. Second layer of packaging: CORE is Bitcoin's "biological son," enjoying native bloodline dividends. This is the easiest cognitive misdirection to trap newcomers. Bitcoin Core (the official Bitcoin client) and CoreDAO $CORE have no connection whatsoever, nor any intersection with Satoshi Nakamoto or Bitcoin's early development team. The project is just an independent public chain, borrowing Bitcoin miner resources to tell a story, forcibly riding on Bitcoin's lineage to create associations. The native Bitcoin community has long been skeptical of such hash power-riding narratives; the "biological son" is a marketing persona fabricated from start to finish. Third layer of packaging: Fully compatible with EVM, Ethereum DeFi projects can easily migrate, and the ecosystem will soon explode. EVM compatibility has long been a basic threshold for public chains and is not an exclusive advantage. Whether developers migrate depends mainly on on-chain liquidity and real user base, not