#TrumpVetoesCBDCBill

Trump Didn't Veto the CBDC Ban. The Clause Did. #TrumpVetoesCBDCBill Trump cancelled the signing of a bill that included a CBDC ban through 2030. Same guy who's publicly called a digital dollar a threat to financial freedom. Markets read it as a U-turn. It isn't. He's holding the bill hostage to get an unrelated elections measure, the SAVE AMERICA ACT, passed first. Classic legislative leverage. The CBDC ban itself cleared the House 358-32 and the Senate 85-5, well above veto-proof margins. Under US law, it becomes law automatically after 10 days if he neither signs nor vetoes it while Congress is in session. The ban is likely going through regardless. What's actually worth watching is the parallel debate on Fed master accounts. Congress is weighing whether crypto and fintech firms should get direct access to the Fed's payment rails via so-called "skinny accounts." The Fed published its formal rulemaking in May; public comments close July 27. If this clears, it would reshape crypto's payment infrastructure far more than any CBDC ban ever could. The real signal: even under a crypto-friendly administration, legislation doesn't move clean. Clause-level politics slow things down. But the direction hasn't reversed. It's just friction in the details. Bigger question: which matters more for crypto's long-term footing in the US, blocking CBDCs, or getting direct access to Fed payment rails? Share your thoughts in the comments 👇 $BTC $SPCX $USDT

On Trump and the CBDC Veto #TrumpVetoesCBDCBill The veto is a defining moment for financial sovereignty versus state control. The veto isn't about a digital dollar. It's about who gets to architect the rails. A CBDC, in its purest government-issued form, isn't a currency upgrade. It's programmable sovereignty. The same infrastructure that enables instant settlement also enables programmable expiration, conditional spending, and real-time surveillance of every transaction. That's not a conspiracy theory. That's a design feature buried in every central bank white paper on the topic. Trump's veto signals something the crypto space rarely acknowledges: the battle lines aren't between parties. They're between control and permissionlessness. The overlooked implication: a CBDC ban in the US doesn't kill the technology. It pushes it underground and offshore. Stablecoins become the default public-private compromise. Privacy chains become the escape valve. And the Fed's research doesn't stop—it rebrands. The real question no one is asking: if the US formally rejects a CBDC, does that make dollar-pegged stablecoins the de facto digital dollar? And if so, who governs them? Circle and Tether don't have Congressional oversight. But they might get it faster than anyone expects. This isn't a win for crypto maximalists. It's an opening move in a much longer negotiation about what digital money looks like—and who controls the kill switch. Not financial advice. A structural observation on the politics of programmable money. $SOL $NES $H

#TrumpVetoesCBDCBill TRUMP’S CBDC DECISION JUST REMINDED CRYPTO OF ONE THING: POLITICS MOVES SLOWER THAN NARRATIVES Many expected a clear signal against CBDCs. Instead, Trump’s refusal to sign a bill containing a CBDC ban has added a new layer of uncertainty to an already complex regulatory landscape. At first glance, the market saw a contradiction. A politician who has repeatedly criticized CBDCs chose not to approve legislation that included a CBDC restriction. But the deeper story may not be about support or opposition to digital currencies at all. It may be about priorities. Analysts suggest the decision reflects broader negotiations surrounding crypto market structure, fintech access to Federal Reserve infrastructure, and the long-term framework that could shape digital finance in the United States. For crypto investors, this is a reminder that adoption is not determined by headlines alone. Regulation is often built through compromise, and compromise rarely arrives in a straight line. The most interesting development is not what was blocked today. It’s what policymakers are still debating behind the scenes: who gets access to the future financial system, how digital assets integrate with traditional banking, and what role blockchain technology will ultimately play in global payments. My view is that this headline is larger than CBDCs. It highlights the growing reality that crypto is no longer fighting for attention—it is fighting for a place inside the financial architecture of the world’s largest economy. Markets react to price. History remembers policy. #TrumpVetoesCBDCBill $TRUMP $BTC $ETH @OKX中文 @OKX星球 @OKX Orbit

#TrumpVetoesCBDCBill: The Man Who Banned CBDCs By Executive Order Just Refused to Sign the Bill That Would Have Made It Law. The irony is almost too clean to believe. The 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act passed the Senate 85-5 and the House 358-32 — both veto-proof margins. It included the first statutory ban in US history on a Federal Reserve-issued digital dollar, prohibiting any CBDC through December 31, 2030, while explicitly protecting stablecoins that are "open, permissionless, and private." Trump was scheduled to sign it in a ceremony at the US Capitol on June 24. He cancelled the event one hour before it was set to begin. Crypto News His condition: Congress must first pass the SAVE America Act, a voter-ID and proof-of-citizenship bill that the Senate rejected 48-50 on June 4 — just three weeks earlier, with four Republicans joining every Democrat in opposition. Trump declared the housing bill "of minor importance" and demanded the legislature deliver something it had already voted down. FinancialContent The constitutional math means the CBDC ban will likely become law anyway. Under the Constitution, a bill presented to the president becomes law automatically after 10 days if he neither signs nor vetoes it — provided Congress remains in session. Both chambers passed it by margins far exceeding the two-thirds threshold needed to override a veto. Coinmonitor The collateral damage is the more urgent story. The CLARITY Act needs a Senate floor vote before the August congressional recess — analysts say preferably by end of June, no later than end of July — to have a realistic chance of becoming law in 2026. Prediction market odds on CLARITY Act passage have already fallen from 74% to 42%. Every day of standoff over the housing bill consumes Senate calendar time the CLARITY Act cannot afford. CryptoSlate Trump is anti-CBDC. He signed the executive order. He refuses to sign the law. And in doing so, he may have handed the CLARITY Act its most dangerous obstacle yet: time. #TrumpVetoesCBDCBill

Worth getting the facts straight: Trump didn't formally veto anything, he canceled the signing ceremony for the bipartisan housing bill that carried a US CBDC ban, reportedly to pressure Congress on a separate elections bill. Net effect for now is the same: the CBDC prohibition is paused, with knock-on implications for the CLARITY Act riding alongside it. For crypto the symbolism cuts an odd way. Killing a CBDC is broadly what the industry wanted, but stalling the whole bill also delays the market-structure clarity everyone's been waiting on. BTC's at $61.7K, down 1.5%, treating this as noise for now. My read: bullish on the anti-CBDC signal, frustrating on the legislative delay. Net neutral until the bill actually moves. NFA, just my read. #TrumpVetoesCBDCBill #OKXOrbit

Trump Didn’t reject the CBDC ban. The process itself is creating the delay. Trump pulled back from signing a bill that included a CBDC ban through 2030, despite repeatedly calling a digital dollar a risk to financial freedom. Some interpreted it as a policy reversal, but the bigger picture suggests otherwise. The hold-up appears tied to legislative strategy. Reports indicate the administration wants movement on the SAVE AMERICA ACT before advancing the broader package. The CBDC provision itself already passed with overwhelming bipartisan support: 358–32 in the House and 85–5 in the Senate, numbers comfortably above veto-proof levels. Under current rules, if the president neither signs nor vetoes a bill while Congress remains in session, it can still become law after the required waiting period. What deserves more attention is the parallel debate around Fed master accounts. Congress is discussing whether crypto and fintech firms should gain direct access to the Federal Reserve payment system through so-called "skinny accounts." If approved, the impact on crypto infrastructure could be much larger than a CBDC ban itself. The larger takeaway: even in a crypto-friendly environment, legislation rarely moves in a straight line. Direction matters, but so does the friction created by the details. The bigger question remains: what matters more for crypto’s long-term future in the US — blocking CBDCs or opening direct access to Fed payment rails? $BTC $SPCX $USDT

🚨 JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Trump says he will not sign the housing bill, which temporarily bans CBDC, unless Congress passes the “SAVE America Act.” The delay could spill over and slow progress on the Crypto CLARITY Act.

ICYMI: Here's a quick news recap from today's Asia & EMEA sessions @TheBlockCo 👇 🏛️ The House of Representatives passed the anti-CBDC 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act with an overwhelming vote on Tuesday, sending it to President Donald Trump's desk. 🗳️ Adrian Boafo, a Maryland state delegate backed by the Protect Progress crypto PAC, won the Democratic primary on Tuesday. 🤝 BNB treasury firm CEA Industries entered into a cooperation agreement with YZi Labs, ending months-long governance disputes. 🚀 Cboe Global Markets launched the first binary options products in its new suite called Cboe Predicts. 📁 Voyager investors filed a notice of appeal challenging Judge Roy Altman's dismissal of claims against Mark Cuban and the Dallas Mavericks. 📨 U.S. law enforcement organizations sent a joint letter to the DOJ and the White House, warning of oversight gaps surrounding a key provision in the Clarity Act. 🇯🇵 Japan's SBI Group announced the official launch of its trust bank-backed stablecoin, JPYSC. 📈 21Shares said bitcoin's post-halving price action "still looks familiar," but sees a recovery toward $100,000 by the end of the year. 🏡 Black Lake and Nuva Labs completed what the firms described as the first onchain minting and transfer of $25 million in institutional mortgage loans on Provenance Blockchain. 🐙 Kraken-incubated Ethereum Layer 2 network Ink is upgrading to OP Enterprise Fully Managed in a multi-year deal. 📉 Rolling one-year notional flows across bitcoin investment vehicles fell to -1,176 BTC, the first negative reading since November 2023, according to K33.

#特朗普拒签CBDC法案 Trump heeft het woningwetvoorstel direct veto gedaan. Het voorstel werd door beide partijen gesteund en met een overweldigende meerderheid aangenomen in het Huis van Afgevaardigden (358 voor, 32 tegen) en de Senaat (85 voor, 5 tegen). Echter, bij Trump werd het voorstel opzij gelegd. $BTC Zijn reden was heel direct: hij heeft miljarden verdiend in de vastgoedsector en niemand begrijpt de huizenmarkt beter dan hij. Hij gelooft dat de kern van het huidige probleem met huizenprijzen te hoge rentetarieven zijn. Zijn belangrijkste eis is één ding — zo snel mogelijk de rente verlagen. Hij gaf ook aan dat hij gewone burgers met eigen woningen niet wil benadelen en niet wil dat de waarde van hun huizen daalt. Maar het cruciale punt is dat het voorstel een clausule bevat die door de cryptogemeenschap zeer wordt gewaardeerd. Deze clausule bepaalt duidelijk dat de Federal Reserve vóór 2030 geen CBDC (centrale bank digitale valuta) mag uitgeven. Eerder werd deze clausule algemeen gezien als een grote meevaller binnen de sector. Nu het voorstel is stilgelegd, vervalt ook deze gunstige clausule en kunnen de verwachtingen niet worden waargemaakt. Trump blijft voorwaarden stellen: het Congres moet eerst zijn "Save American Elections Act" aannemen voordat hij bereid is te onderhandelen over het woningwetvoorstel. Laten we nu naar de markt kijken: de huidige prijs van BTC is 60.814 dollar, met een dieptepunt van 59.000 dollar. ETH staat momenteel op 1.613 dollar, met een dieptepunt van 1.552 dollar. De kleine munt BEAT presteert zwak en daalt met 3,46%. De liquidatiegegevens van BTC tonen duidelijke meningsverschillen in de markt. Binnen 24 uur bedroeg het totaal aan liquidaties 400 miljoen dollar, waarvan 320 miljoen dollar aan longposities en 83,63 miljoen dollar aan shortposities. In 12 uur tijd was er voor 390 miljoen dollar aan liquidaties, waarbij het merendeel longposities waren die eerder waren opgepikt. Deze opleving is slechts een kleine correctie; de druk van vastzittende posities blijft zwaar. Wat betekent dit concreet voor onze cryptohandel? Velen hadden eerder ingezet op het idee dat de VS op korte termijn geen CBDC zou uitrollen, maar die verwachting is nu vervlogen, waardoor de markt een belangrijke beleidssteun verliest. Toch roept Trump herhaaldelijk op tot renteverlaging; als die er komt, zal de marktlidheid toenemen, wat juist gunstig kan zijn voor de grote munten (Bitcoin) en Ethereum. Momenteel zit het beleid vast in een impasse, waardoor verwachtingen rond regelgeving en CBDC onduidelijk zijn en de markt een extra laag onzekerheid krijgt. De markt heeft net een grote daling doorgemaakt; zelfs met een kleine opleving van BTC blijft de omvang van long-liquidaties hoog. In deze situatie van beleidsomslag is het essentieel om voorzichtig te blijven handelen. Doe geen grote posities in op nieuwsgestuurde bewegingen $BTC $ETH #OKX星球话题来啦 #波动雷达：币种异动观察

#特朗普拒签CBDC法案 Om eerlijk te zijn was mijn eerste reactie opluchting toen ik dit nieuws zag. CBDC is in feite een digitale centrale bankvaluta. Als in de toekomst al het geld verandert in een traceerbare en controleerbare digitale dollar, zal de overlevingsruimte voor traditionele cryptocurrencies zeker worden beperkt. Dat Trump deze keer het gerelateerde wetsvoorstel niet ondertekent, is hoewel het meer een politieke strijd is, tenminste een signaal dat er binnen de VS nog steeds grote verdeeldheid bestaat over de voortgang van CBDC. Momenteel is de totale marktkapitalisatie van stabiele munten wereldwijd al meer dan 300 miljard dollar, alleen al de marktkapitalisatie van USDT nadert de 200 miljard dollar. In vergelijking met door de overheid direct uitgegeven digitale dollars, is de markt duidelijk meer geneigd het stabiele muntensysteem te accepteren. Voor de cryptowereld denk ik dat dit een positief teken is. Want wat BTC en het crypto-ecosysteem echt bedreigt, is nooit regulering geweest, maar dat de overheid zelf actief "digitale dollars" gaat uitgeven. Op korte termijn zal het waarschijnlijk weinig effect hebben, maar op de lange termijn, als de VS CBDC blijft onderdrukken en de ontwikkeling van stabiele munten blijft steunen, is het waarschijnlijker dat kapitaal naar BTC, ETH en de hele cryptomarkt zal stromen. Al met al lijkt de volledige implementatie van de digitale dollar voorlopig weer op pauze te staan. #特朗普拒签CBDC法案