Post

Kshsb
Kshsb
Show original
ETH 到底是什么?这个问题是不是很多人没有深挖思考过? 很多人会说,它是一条公链,一个智能合约平台,一个结算层。 但我越来越觉得,这些都只是功能,而不是它真正的价值。 真正决定 ETH 长期价值的,可能不是每天烧掉多少 Gas,也不是 TPS 有多高,而是它能不能成为整个链上金融体系的储备资产(Reserve Asset)。 很多人一直讨论 L2 抢走了 Gas,应用层赚走了利润,所以 ETH 的价值捕获越来越弱。 我认为,这些讨论都没有错,但可能还停留在第一层。 真正的问题应该是: 未来整个链上金融体系,到底需不需要持有 ETH? 举个例子。 很多人觉得美元强,是因为 SWIFT、Visa、美联储。 但真正支撑美元地位的,并不是这些支付工具。 而是全球贸易、大宗商品、外汇储备、国际结算几乎都围绕美元展开。 大家持有美元,不是为了每天转账,而是因为整个金融体系都需要美元。 ETH 会不会也走向同样的逻辑? 如果未来 DeFi 越来越成熟,RWA 大规模上链,稳定币继续扩张,越来越多资产开始在链上发行、交易、借贷、抵押…… 那么真正重要的,就不是每天消耗多少 ETH,而是整个链上金融体系,有没有越来越多人必须持有 ETH。 今天 ETH 已经是很多 DeFi 协议最重要的抵押资产,也是整个网络安全的核心资产,大量 ETH 被长期质押。 如果未来链上金融不断扩大,而 ETH 依然是整个体系最核心的抵押品和储备资产,那么它的价值来源就不再只是 Gas,而是整个链上金融生态。 当然,这里面最大的变量也恰恰在这里。 如果未来 DeFi、RWA、稳定币越来越繁荣,但这些价值最终都没有回流到 ETH,或者越来越不需要持有 ETH,那么市场今天对 ETH 的估值,也许就是合理的。 所以我越来越觉得,未来决定 ETH 命运的,不是谁的 TPS 更高,也不是谁的手续费更低。 而是一个更底层的问题: 随着链上金融越来越大,ETH 是会越来越不可替代,还是会越来越可有可无? 我认为,这个问题的答案,才是真正决定 ETH 下一个十年的价值。 $ETH $ETH $BTC
Kshsb
Kshsb
It explains why ETH hasn't risen now, but doesn't answer whether ETH is worth it in the future. Many people understand Ethereum as a company and then ask how much it earned this year. But I prefer to understand it as a set of financial infrastructure. The current issue is not that there is no value on-chain, but whether this part of the value actually flows back to ETH itself. For example. The increasing traffic on the highway every day does not necessarily mean the toll station earns more and more. If later most vehicles switch to free side roads and overpasses, the toll station's income will naturally decrease. L2 is somewhat like these side roads. A large number of transactions have been migrated to L2 because it is faster, has lower fees, and offers a better user experience. So today, many stablecoin transfers and DeFi interactions indeed cause the mainnet to consume less Gas than before. This is also where the market has been questioning ETH. The ecosystem is becoming more prosperous, but the value has not fully flowed back to ETH. However, I think we cannot only see this side. L2 does not exist independently. Whether it is Optimism, Arbitrum, or Base, they ultimately need to submit data to the Ethereum mainnet for final settlement, and their security also comes from ETH. So ETH is more like providing the security layer for the entire ecosystem, rather than being responsible for processing every single transaction. The real question then becomes: As the security layer of the entire ecosystem, how much value should ETH take? If in the future more and more value stays in L2, Rollup, and the application layer, and ETH can only collect a small "toll," then the market's current valuation of it may not be wrong. But if Ethereum continues to optimize the value capture mechanism in the future, allowing the development of the entire ecosystem to feedback more to ETH—for example, more ETH being burned, more ETH staked, more settlement demand returning to the mainnet—then the market's pricing of ETH today might be completely different. So the question I am thinking about now is no longer whether ETH has an ecosystem. Almost no one doubts this. What I really care about is: How much of the value created by the Ethereum ecosystem ultimately belongs to ETH. Because this is the core that truly determines ETH's long-term price. $ETH

Disclaimer: OKX Orbit content is provided for informational purposes only. Learn more

Replies

No comments yet. Be the first to reply!