Post

Market Filter #001: Scoring Crypto the Same Way, Every Week, No Exceptions DOGE has a 10/10 liquidity score this week. It also has a 2/10 on revenue and a 3/10 on developer activity. Same asset, same week one number says top-tier, the other two say almost nothing structural underneath. That gap is the entire reason this series exists. Market Filter started this week (Aug 4-10) and runs, unchanged, until November 2026. Ten projects, five factors, each scored 1-10: liquidity, user growth, developer activity, revenue/fees, relative strength. Total possible score: 50. The method can't change until the test period ends that's what makes this falsifiable rather than commentary that quietly adjusts itself after the fact. This week: ETH leads at 49/50 , 10s across liquidity, users, and dev activity. SOL follows at 47, the only project with a perfect relative-strength score. SUI takes third at 43, balanced across the board. ARB (42) and APT (40) show the same consistency without a weak factor. CORE sits at 38. ADA (36) is more interesting: strong liquidity and dev activity, but weak revenue and relative strength high activity, weaker follow-through. BICO and GRVT (31, 29) land in higher-risk territory on thinner liquidity. DOGE ties for last at 29, but for a different reason: not thin, lopsided. None of this is a buy signal. A high score means more real activity trading depth, users, dev output, revenue behind the price than the narrative suggests. Price can still move independently short term. That gap is exactly what November's backtest measures: do fundamentals actually predict anything, or is this just a different story dressed up as data? I don't know yet. That's the point of running it three months before concluding anything and I'd rather find the holes now than in November. Disagreements welcome.NFA , DYOR