Post

挖矿的小羊
挖矿的小羊
Show original
坦白说—— 在加密圈,“沃伦”这两个字基本就是公敌代名词。 她反比特币、反ETF、想掐死整个行业。过去几年,她每次开口,我们都恨不得她闭嘴。 但这次,不一样。 8月4日,沃伦和民主党参议员布卢门撒尔联名致信SEC主席阿特金斯。 要求调查一件事:特朗普的迷因币TRUMP,是不是一场“Rug Pull”。 我知道你想说什么——“沃伦又在搞政治攻击。” 先别急,看数据。 2025年1月17日,就职前三天,TRUMP代币上线。 第二天,特朗普本人在X上发帖推广。 市值一度冲到90亿美元。 然后呢? 现在币价不到1.5美元。 从高点跌了98%。 近100万个钱包亏损,累计损失38.1亿美元。 三分之二的买家血本无归。 与此同时——特朗普关联实体从这枚币上赚了多少钱? 6.36亿美元。 80%的代币供应量掌握在特朗普组织关联方手中。 近100万人亏38亿。 一个人赚6.36亿。 这不是“市场有风险,投资需谨慎”能糊弄过去的。 这是赤裸裸的“权力变现”。 一个总统,就职前三天发币,用自己的名字和职位背书,号召支持者买入,然后——没有然后了。 币价跌了98%,支持者的钱没了,总统的钱包鼓了。 沃伦在信里写了一句我看了三遍的话: “即使潜在的违法者包括那些拥有强大政治关系的人,SEC也必须依法执法。” 这句话,没毛病。 我知道你要说:“迷因币本来就不算证券,SEC管不着。” 确实,SEC自己之前也说过,迷因币“用途或功能有限”,不符合证券定义。 但这次不一样。 这不是一个匿名团队发的土狗盘。这是美国总统,用自己的官方账号推广,用自己的身份背书,在自己的支持者中间募资。 然后赚了6.36亿。 如果这都不算“利用职权牟利”,那什么算? 如果这都不值得调查,那“利益冲突”这四个字还有意义吗? 有人说沃伦这是在搞政治,是在给《数字资产市场清晰法案》的谈判施压。 也许吧。 但政治动机归政治动机,问题本身归问题本身。 你可以反对沃伦所有的加密政策。你可以觉得她就是想扼杀创新。 但这次她问的问题—— “一个总统,在就职前三天发币,让近百万支持者亏损38亿,自己赚6.36亿,而监管自己的SEC主席是自己任命的”—— 这个问题,本身是成立的。 加密行业要真正走向主流,就必须接受一个现实: 当总统发币收割支持者时,整个行业的信誉都在被透支。 我们天天喊“不要信任,要验证”。 结果总统发个币,支持者连验证都懒得做,直接冲。 冲完了亏98%,然后怪谁?怪市场?怪庄家?还是怪那个发币的人? 我们不能一边喊着“去中心化”,一边纵容最中心化的权力来这个圈子里割韭菜。 我不是沃伦的支持者。 过去不是,现在不是,将来大概率也不是。 但这次,她问的问题,值得每一个加密从业者认真思考。 不是思考“怎么反击沃伦”, 而是思考——我们这个行业,到底要不要底线? $BTC $TRUMP $WLFI #特朗普代币遭参议员要求调查
挖矿的小羊
挖矿的小羊
989,000 people lost 3.8 billion, the president earned 636 million: This is not an "investment failure," this is a "regulatory black hole" 989,000 wallets, with a total loss of 3.81 billion USD. The same project, Trump-related entities recorded 636 million USD in revenue. This is not the profit and loss of a free market. This is a 989,000 to 1 asymmetric game. You lose money, he makes money. You get cut, he counts money. And—the one cutting you is the current U.S. president. Rewind to January 17, 2025, three days before Trump's inauguration. The TRUMP token quietly launched. At that time, the vast majority of retail investors were still scrolling their phones, reading news, completely unaware of what was happening. But on-chain data clearly shows—some traders completed their positions within the first second of the token launch. One trader named Naseem bought in at 1.09 million USD in the first second, paying 84,000 USD in priority transaction fees, ultimately profiting 109 million USD. The next day, Trump publicly posted a call to buy on X. By the time retail investors saw the tweet and rushed in, insiders were already counting their money. This is not a conspiracy theory. This is the fact laid out by on-chain data. The token price once surged to 73 USD, with a market cap soaring to 9 billion USD. Then what? A free fall all the way down. Today, TRUMP price is under 1.5 USD, with a market cap of only 366 million USD. From peak to bottom, it dropped 98%. Those who bought at the high lost 97%. Once a top three meme coin by market cap, it now can't even enter the top 100. Senators Warren and Blumenthal, in a letter to the SEC, proposed a precise concept—"Soft Rug Pull." What is a traditional Rug Pull? The project team runs away overnight, wallets emptied, people disappear. But Trump's play is more advanced—not running away overnight, but boiling the frog slowly. The project hasn't disappeared, the team hasn't fled, but the price drops day by day, market cap shrinks bit by bit, support withdraws step by step. Retail investors hold on with the hope of "just a little longer," watching their accounts go from 50% loss to 80% loss to 97% loss. This is not running away, this is a "soft run." Not running, not disappearing, not illegal—but your money is gone. On the other hand, Trump's financial disclosures show he earned over 1.4 billion USD from crypto-related businesses in 2025. Just the licensing income from TRUMP was 636 million USD. Trump Organization-related entities still hold 80% of the total token supply. 80% of the chips are in insiders' hands, 98% of retail investors are losing money. Think about it, really think about it. The biggest question now is not "Did Trump cut retail investors?"—the data is here, the facts are clear. The biggest question is: Who will investigate? SEC Chair Gary Gensler was personally appointed by Trump. Letting the subordinate of the investigated person investigate their own boss—how is this different from letting a thief hold the safe's key? The two senators wrote a harsh sentence in the letter: "The SEC must be willing to enforce the law, even if the potential violators include those with strong political connections." That's what they say. But in reality? The SEC currently refuses to comment. The president issues tokens, the president calls to buy, the president makes money, the president's subordinates decide whether to investigate. This is not a failure of the crypto market. This is a failure of regulation. 989,000 people lost 3.8 billion USD, Trump earned 636 million. If this is not fraud, then what is fraud? If this is not investigated, then what is the purpose of the SEC? When the president can issue tokens three days before inauguration, use social media to pump, let supporters take the bag, and earn 600 million himself— This is not a free market. This is a 989,000 to 1 "asymmetric game." $BTC $TRUMP $WLFI #特朗普代币遭参议员要求调查

Disclaimer: OKX Orbit content is provided for informational purposes only. Learn more

Replies

No comments yet. Be the first to reply!