Post

挖矿的小羊
挖矿的小羊
Show original
一边亏5700万,一边狂买BTC——特朗普家到底在演哪出? 兄弟们,昨天有个新闻把我整不会了。 特朗普家族旗下的矿企American Bitcoin(ABTC),Q2净亏损5720万美元,连续第三个季度亏损。 但同一份财报显示——比特币储备从7021枚增至8002枚,单季增长14%。 亏着钱,还拼命买? 更魔幻的是——同一天,特朗普传媒(TMTG)把价值1.65亿美元的比特币转到了Crypto.com。 虽然后来澄清“没卖,只是换托管方”,但链上数据显示——2,628枚BTC转出后,手里只剩4,261枚,刚好够可转债的抵押品 。 同一家族,两家公司,同一天,一个在买,一个在压。 你告诉我该信谁? 先说American Bitcoin这笔账。 5720万亏损怎么来的? 7120万美元是比特币持仓的“公允价值减值” ——不是真金白银亏出去了,是会计上按市价计提的账面亏损。 挖矿主业呢? Q2营收6700万美元,挖了932枚BTC,创单季历史纪录。 单枚挖矿成本约3.65万美元,而BTC现价6.3万美元——毛利率接近50% 。 CEO Mike Ho原话:“Bitcoin is a growing capital asset, and we believe its long-term compounding will outperform our cost of capital.” 翻译成人话:亏的是账面上的数字,赚的是真金白银的BTC。账面亏损可以忍,BTC不能停。 再看特朗普传媒那边。 1.65亿美金BTC转到Crypto.com。 没卖?行,信你。 但2,628枚BTC转出去之后,剩下的4,261枚正好等于可转债的抵押品数量。 这意味着什么? 之前那批BTC是“自由持仓”,现在变成了“质押资产”。 质押就有被清算的风险——BTC跌到某个价位,债主有权平仓。 一个是越跌越买,一个是越跌越抵押。 同一个爹,两种玩法。 现在回到你最关心的问题:这影响我对BTC短期走势的判断吗? 今天(8月4日)亚洲早盘,BTC一度逼近64,100美元,较前一日涨约2%,收复了周一失守的6.3万关口。 但别高兴太早。 BTC现价约63,150美元,较一年前累计下跌约45%。 ABTC的股价呢?较上市峰值累计跌了约95%,7月被迫做了1比15的反向合股才能留在纳斯达克。 Eric Trump本人持有的6%股份,市值缩水超过6亿美元。 一家公司账面亏5700万,创始人个人亏6个亿——还在买。 你说这是信仰还是愚蠢? 我的判断很简单: 短期来看,这两条新闻对BTC价格的直接影响有限。 市场更关注的是宏观和流动性,不是一家矿企的财报。 但中长期来看,ABTC的选择给出了一个清晰的信号: 在3.65万美元的挖矿成本面前,6.3万美元的BTC是“便宜货”。 Eric Trump自己说了:“我们的优势在于,我们不是按市价购买,我们的挖矿成本大约是市价的五折。” 翻译:别人在6.3万买BTC是投机,我在3.65万挖出来是利润。 特朗普家两家公司同一天做出相反操作—— ABTC在囤,TMTG在押。 一个告诉你“BTC长期看涨”,一个告诉你“BTC我先抵押了再说”。 你信哪个? 我信数据。 ABTC的挖矿成本3.65万,毛利率50%——只要BTC不跌破4万,这家公司就能活下去,并且越活越大。 TMTG把BTC质押出去——说明他们缺现金,需要借钱。 一个是生产者的逻辑,一个是消费者的逻辑。 你是生产者,还是消费者? $BTC $ETH $SOL #特朗普家族矿企亏损仍增持BTC
挖矿的小羊
挖矿的小羊
ISM hits a four-year high, US Treasury yields fall — the market is going against the Federal Reserve Brothers, today I want to talk about something strange. On August 3rd, the ISM Manufacturing PMI was released — 55.6. What level is that? The highest since May 2022, expanding for the seventh consecutive month. New orders at 56.7, production index at 58.5 hitting a new high since the end of 2021. Manufacturing employment grew for the first time since last September. Goldman Sachs directly raised its Q3 GDP forecast from 1.5% to 2.4%. The economy is booming. CME data shows the probability of a 25 basis point Fed rate hike in September has surged to 67.2%. Logically — strong economy and strong rate hike expectations — US Treasury yields should be surging upwards, right? But what happened? On August 3rd, the 10-year Treasury yield fell below 1.70% intraday, the lowest since June 1st. The 30-year yield dropped more than 4 basis points to 5.226%. Data supports rate hikes, but yields are falling. The market is going against the Fed. Why? Two forces are pulling yields down. First, oil prices crashed. On the 3rd, Trump announced the resumption of US-Iran talks, saying the Strait of Hormuz "could be fully open as soon as tomorrow." WTI crude futures plunged over 7% at one point, Brent fell below $82. Although Iran’s Foreign Ministry quickly denied the talks, the market already reacted with a drop out of respect. Geopolitical risk premium was instantly removed — inflation expectations cooled, so long-term bond yields naturally fell. Second, someone is "supporting" US Treasuries. US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen did something — publicly called on the Fed to expand the FIMA repo facility. What is FIMA? It allows overseas central banks like Japan’s to use US Treasuries as collateral to swap for dollars without directly selling Treasuries on the market. Japan holds about $1.14 trillion in US Treasuries, the largest overseas holder globally. If Japan were to frantically sell Treasuries to intervene in the yen, the 30-year yield would probably have broken 6% long ago. Yellen is basically saying: don’t sell, I’ll have the Fed lend you money. This is a solid positive for US Treasuries. Now the 30-year yield is stuck around 5.3%. On one side, strong economic data and rate hike expectations push yields up; on the other, falling oil prices and liquidity support pull yields down. Bank of America calls this a "textbook inflation credibility shock" — the market doesn’t believe the Fed can control inflation. The 30-year Treasury term premium has surged to 1.51%, the highest since 2013. Is 5.3% a top or a bottom? Nobody knows. But one thing is certain — the market no longer obediently listens to the Fed. What does this mean for crypto? Bitcoin is now fluctuating around $63,000, down nearly 50% from the $126,000 high at the start of the year. The macro logic is increasingly twisted — Rate hikes are bearish for risk assets, but falling oil prices are bullish for risk appetite. Falling Treasury yields theoretically benefit BTC, but rate hike expectations suppress capital inflows. Two forces are fighting, and BTC is caught in the middle. My judgment: If long-term Treasury yields really top out at 5.3% — that’s a medium-term positive for BTC. Expectations of a liquidity inflection point will gradually be priced in. But if the Fed really hikes in September and short-term rates continue to rise — risk assets will take another hit. What’s most feared now isn’t the rate hike itself, but the word "uncertainty." The market isn’t afraid of bad news, it’s afraid of not knowing how bad the news really is. As long as 5.3% isn’t broken, bulls and bears won’t dare to take heavy positions. $BTC $BZ $CL #ISM创四年新高,美债收益率反跌

Disclaimer: OKX Orbit content is provided for informational purposes only. Learn more

Replies

No comments yet. Be the first to reply!