Post

挖矿的小羊
挖矿的小羊
Show original
三组数据看懂当下:就业崩了、ETF回来了、CPI还没来 8月7日,周五晚上。 非农数据出来了——减少2.3万人。 市场预期是多少?增加8.8万人。 差了11万。 你盯着屏幕,第一反应是什么? “完了,经济要崩了。” 然后你看了看比特币——站上65,000美元。 你再看了看加息概率——CME数据显示,9月维持利率不变的概率跳到了55.6% 。 就业越差,市场越嗨。 是不是感觉哪里不对劲? 先别急着嗨。把这三组数据串起来看。 【数据①——就业:已落地】 7月非农:-2.3万 vs 预期 +8.8万 5月数据:从+12.9万下修至+6.3万 6月数据:从+5.7万下修至+2万 两月合计下修10.3万个岗位。 这不是“不及预期”,这是直接转负了。 但更诡异的是——失业率从4.2%降到了4.1%。 就业少了,失业率反而降了? 因为26.4万人退出了劳动力市场。 劳动参与率跌到61.4% ——2021年初以来最低。 剔除疫情那两年,这是1976年以来最低。 翻译成人话:不是就业改善了,是人直接不找了。 工资增速也崩了——平均时薪同比只涨了3.2% ,2021年5月以来最低。 信号:就业市场凉了。但凉得不太对劲。 【数据②——资金:正在发生】 就在非农数据公布的那一周,比特币现货ETF录得8.54亿美元净流入。 自4月以来最强的周度流入。 贝莱德IBIT一家就吸了6.94亿美元,占总额超过80%。 8月3日到7日,连续多日净流入。 机构资金在65,000美元附近,正在悄悄建仓。 信号:聪明钱在非农后重新入场了。 【数据③——通胀:即将揭晓】 8月12日,周三。北京时间晚上8:30。 美国7月CPI公布。 市场预计: 整体CPI年率:从3.5% 降至3.4% 核心CPI年率:从2.6% 降至2.5% 看起来在降温,对吧? 但别高兴太早。 经济学家预计,7月核心服务业通胀将环比上涨0.3% ——而5月到6月这个数据是持平的。 美国银行警告:核心服务业的回升,可能让9月加息依然摆在桌面上。 花旗说:通胀走软的话,9月加息基本排除。 美银说:服务业通胀反弹的话,9月加息依然有可能。 两家顶级投行,看法完全相反。 现在把三组数据放在一起: 就业→已落地。凉了,但不够凉。 资金→在流入。积极,但还没爆发。 CPI→未揭晓。这才是决定9月FOMC到底加不加息的底牌。 现在的市场,像极了考试前一夜的学生: 非农是模拟考,考砸了,松了口气。 ETF是补习班,报上了,心里踏实了点。 但CPI,才是真正的期末考试。 模拟考考砸了不代表期末稳了。补习班报了不代表一定能过。 期末考砸了,前面全是白费。 CME数据显示,目前9月加息概率是44.4% 。 几乎是一半对一半。 如果CPI数据低于预期—— 9月加息概率可能跌破30%,BTC可能直接冲上68,000甚至70,000。 如果CPI数据高于预期—— 9月加息概率可能跳回55%以上,BTC可能瞬间回踩62,000甚至更低。 65,000这个位置,上下各3000美元的空间。 方向,全看周三晚上那一个数字。 最后,给你一个建议—— 就业数据给了方向预期,ETF流入给了资金背书。 但CPI才是最终裁判。 周三之前—— 管住手。 等数据落地。 别在期末考试前夜,把筹码全押在模拟考的成绩上。 65,000附近,有人在买,有人在卖。 谁对谁错? 周三晚上8:30,答案揭晓。$BTC $ETH $XAU #本周三CPI公布,9月加息定价会改写吗?
挖矿的小羊
挖矿的小羊
When everyone is focused on the Strait of Hormuz, the real opportunity might be hidden "after the agreement is implemented" On the morning of August 10, you open your eyes and glance at your phone. Brent crude oil rises to $84.5 per barrel. Bitcoin stands at $65,000. Gold rises to $4,350 per ounce. You breathe a sigh of relief—BTC hasn't dropped. But have you ever considered this question: If the Strait of Hormuz agreement is really signed, what will happen to BTC? If, like most people, the answer that comes to your mind is—"Agreement reached = oil price falls = inflation drops = Fed eases = BTC rises," then you might be making a fatal mistake. Let's first talk about what's happening now. At the beginning of August, everyone thought the Strait of Hormuz would reopen. Trump said, "It could fully open as soon as tomorrow." Iran said it was "very close to reaching an agreement" with Oman. Oil prices immediately plunged more than 6%. BTC rebounded to $64,500. All seemed peaceful. Then, Iran suddenly changed its stance. On August 8, Iran's Supreme National Security Council issued five conditions in one go before agreeing to reopen the strait: Permanent cessation of military actions against Iran, lifting all sanctions, returning frozen assets, compensating losses... Iran's Foreign Minister Alagheband said more bluntly: "Even if an agreement is reached with Oman, it does not mean the Strait of Hormuz will reopen." In plain language: an agreement is an agreement, reopening is reopening—two different things. On the same day, Houthi forces used drones to bomb Saudi Aramco's refinery. The agreement was not signed, oil prices rose back, and BTC hovered around $65,000. What is the market trading now? A very simple binary logic: Agreement reached = oil price falls = BTC rises Agreement not reached = oil price rises = BTC falls This logic has been fully priced in. On August 5, when expectations for the agreement heated up, oil prices plummeted and BTC rebounded. On August 10, when the agreement was not finalized, oil prices rose and BTC did not crash. The market has repeatedly played this "agreement reached/not reached" multiple times. But I want to ask you a contrarian question— What if the agreement really is reached? Most people's script is: agreement reached → oil price falls → inflation eases → Fed rate cut expectations rise → BTC rises. This script is not wrong, but it's too short-sighted. After the agreement is reached, what really deserves attention is not how many dollars the oil price falls, but three deeper matters: First, Iran's "de facto recognition." The core of this agreement is not "reopening the strait," but "the manner of reopening." According to the preliminary agreement between Iran and Oman, the two existing shipping lanes in the strait will be closed and replaced by a new temporary route passing through Iranian territorial waters. Iran will establish a "new passage mode different from the past 60 years" in the Strait of Hormuz. What does this mean? It means Iran's control over the Strait of Hormuz is being recognized in the form of an agreement for the first time. For the past 60 years, the Strait of Hormuz was "international waters." In the future, it will be a "strait under Iran's control." This is not a concession; it is a transfer of power. Second, the de-dollarization of transit fees. Iran announced as early as May that transit fees through the Strait of Hormuz would accept Bitcoin, USDT, and RMB for settlement. If the agreement is implemented, this "non-dollar settlement system" will be officially legalized. A strait that carries one-fifth of the world's oil trade, with transit fees not paid in dollars—what this means for the "petrodollar system" goes without saying. Third, broader geopolitical reconciliation. The Iranian parliament has already approved the overall framework of the "Strategic Action Plan to Ensure the Security and Development of the Strait of Hormuz." Iran's goal has never been just "collecting tolls," but to use the strait as leverage to push for sanctions relief, asset unfreezing, and regional ceasefire. If the agreement is ultimately implemented, even if only temporarily and partially, it means the US-Iran game is moving from "military confrontation" to "negotiation phase." And the start of the negotiation phase is far more important for global risk assets than one or two oil price fluctuations. The market always overreacts in the short term to geopolitical "noise" and underestimates the "signals" brought by geopolitical restructuring. Right now, everyone is focused on "whether the agreement is signed"—this is noise. After the agreement is signed, who controls the strait, what currency the transit fees are settled in, and whether sanctions are eased—these are the signals. Noise makes people anxious; signals make people money. So what should you do now? If you are trading the binary event of "agreement reached/not reached"— You are already late. This logic has been repeatedly priced in by the market countless times; any unexpected outcome is already reflected in the price. If you are thinking about the "world after the agreement is implemented"— Then you should focus on three things: How the control of the strait is described in the final agreement text Whether transit fees are officially allowed to be settled in cryptocurrencies Whether the sanctions relief clauses contain substantive content Any one of these three signals landing will have a more lasting impact on the crypto market than oil price fluctuations of a few dollars. One last thing— The real status of the Strait of Hormuz agreement is: Iran has put forward conditions that the US cannot fully accept, but neither side wants to return to full-scale war. So what is the most likely outcome? Not "agreement reached," nor "negotiations broken off." It is a conditional, partial, phased temporary arrangement. The agreement will be signed, but the strait will not fully open immediately. Oil prices will fall, but not back to pre-war levels. BTC will rise, but not because of easing risk sentiment—because the world's most critical energy channel has officially accepted Bitcoin as a settlement tool for the first time. This is the real long-term narrative. Don't be led by the short-term noise of "whether the agreement is signed." Focus on the rewriting of the power structure, not the rise and fall of oil prices. $BTC $BZ $CL #霍尔木兹协议未落地,油价风险再升温?

Disclaimer: OKX Orbit content is provided for informational purposes only. Learn more

Replies

No comments yet. Be the first to reply!