Post

挖矿的小羊
挖矿的小羊
Show original
8.5亿美金回流,81%进了贝莱德口袋:ETF回暖,但这是你一个人的牛市 8月第一周,比特币ETF净流入8.535亿美金。 朋友圈刷屏了——“机构回来了!”“牛回速归!” 但你猜,这8.5亿里面,有多少是真正属于“市场”的? 1.7亿。 剩下的6.93亿,全进了贝莱德IBIT一个口袋。 81%。 11只ETF,瓜分不到1.7亿。 这不是回暖,这是一个人的独角戏。 先看数据有多夸张—— 8月3日到7日,连续五个交易日净流入。 富达FBTC,全周贡献1.16亿——第二大。 Bitwise BITB,211万。ARK 21Shares ARKB,194万。 与此同时,景顺BTCO流出1937万,VanEck HODL流出1055万。 一边是贝莱德在疯狂扫货,一边是同行在默默撤退。 这不是“机构全面看多”。 这是一批特定的机构客户,通过一个特定的通道,在执行一次特定的配置。 为什么是贝莱德? 全球最大资管——11.5万亿美元的管理规模。它的销售渠道覆盖了全世界最有钱的养老金、主权基金、家族办公室。 当贝莱德说“比特币可以配”,它的客户听。 当别的ETF说“比特币可以配”,客户说“我再看看”。 品牌就是信任,渠道就是一切。就这么简单。 但更值得问的是—— 其他11只ETF为什么不行? 答案可能扎心:因为当前这波资金,并不是在“赌比特币涨”。 他们在做的是:通过最安全、最合规的通道,拿到比特币的敞口。 注意关键词:最安全、最合规。 贝莱德就是那个“最”。 这意味着什么?这批资金对比特币的信念,可能比你想的要薄弱得多。 他们进来,是因为贝莱德说可以。如果有一天贝莱德说“减配”,他们出去,也不会打招呼。 再看以太坊那边。 同期,以太坊ETF净流入2.449亿,连续五周净流入,创2026年最长纪录。 看起来不错对吧? 但比特币ETF一周8.5亿,以太坊2.4亿——不到三分之一。 贝莱德的ETHA虽然领涨,但体量跟IBIT完全不是一个量级。 机构对ETH的态度很明确:可以配一点,但别指望我跟BTC一样重仓。 试探性配置,不是信仰充值。 说句扎心的话—— ETF回暖是真的,但回暖的“宽度”比“高度”更值得警惕。 8月才过5个交易日,流入已经是整个7月的近5倍。 听着很猛对吧? 但比特币整个2026年至今,ETF仍然是净流出44.4亿美金。 44.4亿。 近期的8.5亿,不过是在填补二季度大撤退留下的坑。 而且,资金进来了8.5亿,比特币价格呢? 整个五天的流入期,比特币一直趴在65000美元以下。 8.5亿美金砸进去,价格纹丝不动。 这说明什么?有人在接盘,有人在出货。谁在出,自己想。 更诡异的是情绪。 比特币重回65000,但“加密货币恐惧与贪婪指数”依然停在25——“极度恐惧” 。 ETF在买,巨鲸在囤,但散户在怕。 交易量环比下降9%,是2024年10月以来第二低的完整交易周。 价升量缩——这不是牛市该有的样子。 最后说两句—— 贝莱德一家独大,既是实力的体现,也是风险的提示。 高度集中,意味着如果这批客户改变主意,流出也会同样集中。 到时候不是“ETF集体流出”,而是“贝莱德一家的客户撤退,带走整个市场的信心”。 回暖是真的。但回暖的宽度,比高度更值得你失眠。 这不是百花齐放。 这是一家独大。 你赚的是贝莱德客户的配置钱,还是市场全面转向的牛市钱——这两个故事,结局完全不同。 $BTC $ETH $OKB #现货ETF资金回流,BTC与ETH能否接力?
挖矿的小羊
挖矿的小羊
23% surge in two days, shorts lose 9 billion: Is SPCX's rebound valuation repair or a short squeeze kill? Have you ever seen a stock plunge 14% the day before the largest unlock in history, then surge 23% for two consecutive days? SpaceX did it. After market close on August 4, SpaceX released its first post-IPO earnings report—revenue of $7.814 billion, up 92% year-over-year, far exceeding the expected $6.9 billion; net loss narrowed from $1.008 billion to $541 million; adjusted EBITDA soared from $1.2 billion to $3.5 billion, up 191% year-over-year. By all accounts, a strong earnings report. Then on August 5, the stock plunged 13.6%, closing at $108.27, a new post-IPO closing low. Market cap evaporated over $1 trillion from the $225 all-time high. Do you know people who, seeing revenue double and losses halve, eagerly bought the dip only to lose 15% overnight? Because you’re not looking at the same thing. You see revenue. The market sees capital expenditure. Q2 capex was $18.369 billion, 6.5 times the $2.825 billion in the same period last year. Of that, $15.828 billion went to AI compute infrastructure, accounting for 86.2% of total capex, which is 6.2 times the AI business’s quarterly revenue. The money Starlink makes ($4.291 billion revenue, $1.656 billion profit) isn’t enough to fill the AI and aerospace money pits. AI business lost $1.257 billion, aerospace lost $542 million. Of the three segments, only Starlink is profitable. The other two are money sinks. Musk said on the call: compute power will exceed 2 gigawatts by year-end, nearly 10 gigawatts by next year-end. In plain terms: the cash burn is just beginning. The market voted with its feet—stock plunged 14% after earnings. But the story isn’t over. More frightening than earnings is the unlock. On August 6, the first batch of 911.5 million restricted shares unlocked, increasing float from 639 million to 1.55 billion shares. At the then stock price, that’s about $100 billion potential selling pressure. This is the largest lockup expiration in U.S. capital market history. Shorts went crazy. According to S3 Partners data, as of July 29, short positions reached 219.3 million shares, 34% of the float. 95% of lendable shares were already borrowed. The nominal short size even exceeded Tesla’s short bets. This isn’t just shorting. This is all-in betting on SpaceX’s collapse. Shorts had once booked paper gains exceeding $9 billion. Then, the reversal came. August 6, unlock day. Stock didn’t crash but rose 6.14%, closing at $114.92. Trading volume was 255 million shares. August 7, surged another 15.83%, closing at $133.11. Two-day cumulative gain about 23%, market cap increased over $327 billion. Just under $2 from the $135 IPO price. The script completely reversed. Why? Three words: short covering. Let’s break down the logic of this situation— Step 1: Before earnings, shorts frantically increased positions to 34%, betting on disappointing earnings + unlock sell-off. Step 2: Earnings were actually good (revenue beat, loss narrowed), but scary capex caused a 14% drop. Shorts booked big paper profits. Step 3: Unlock day arrived. Shorts waited for early employees and investors to dump shares. Step 4: No dump. Early investors not only didn’t sell, some bought. Step 5: Stock rose instead of falling. Shorts panicked—219 million short shares, every $1 rise means $219 million loss. Step 6: Shorts rushed to cover. Covering means buying. Buying pushed price higher. Higher price forced more shorts to cover. This is the classic short squeeze script. Even more intense are signals from the options market. On Thursday, a professional trader made this move— Sold $12 million worth of $90 strike put options expiring June next year, while buying $4.3 million worth of $220 strike call options with the same expiry. Net collected $7.7 million in premiums. In plain terms: this person bets SPCX won’t drop 20% in the next 10 months, and also bets the stock could double. That afternoon, another similar trade: sold $75 puts, bought $185 calls, expiring January 2028. Smart money is using a "sell put + buy call" combo, heavily betting SpaceX has bottomed. On Friday, total options volume hit 2.24 million contracts, with 1.3 million calls, a record high. Capital is flowing back in. But don’t celebrate too soon. Over 250 million shares remain shorted, about 16% of tradable shares. Shorts were just squeezed once, not wiped out. And more unlocks are coming—319 million shares may unlock on August 20, about 700 million in September, nearly 700 million in October. Is this rebound a valuation repair after bad news is priced in, or a short squeeze-driven short-term spike? Depends on two things: First, will shorts continue to add positions and fight back? Second, will early investors sell in the upcoming unlock rounds? To be blunt: This SPCX script is essentially gamblers betting on a company’s life or death. Shorts bet SpaceX can’t support its valuation; bulls bet Musk can deliver on promises. Both sides are heavily staked, but chips are completely asymmetric— Shorts hold 250 million borrowed shares, vulnerable to forced covering. Bulls hold Musk’s "$1 trillion revenue by 2030" dream. How far can a rebound propped up by trading structure go? $SPCX $BTC $ETH #财报观察员:空头回补成焦点,SpaceX后续怎么看?

Disclaimer: OKX Orbit content is provided for informational purposes only. Learn more

Replies

No comments yet. Be the first to reply!