Post

挖矿的小羊
挖矿的小羊
Show original
当Saylor说“永远不要卖掉你的比特币”时,他到底在对谁说话? 对你。不是对他自己。 8月3日,Strategy又卖了1638枚比特币,套现1.047亿美元。 均价63957美元。 持仓成本75419美元。 每一枚亏了将近11500美元。 这是公司6月底以来第三次卖币。之前5月底卖了32枚试水,7月初卖了3588枚。 现在又来了。 而且董事会已经把套现上限从12.5亿美元直接提到50亿美元——翻了4倍。 有人跑去问Saylor:你不是说“永远不要卖”吗? Saylor的回应,才是今天最精彩的部分。 他在X上说: “当我说‘永远不要卖掉你的比特币’时,我是以一个储户对另一个储户的身份在说话。我从未卖过我的比特币,一枚聪都没有卖过。 Strategy是一家上市公司,不是我的钱包。” 翻译成人话: “我喊的口号是让你们听的。我自己确实没卖——但我的公司该卖就卖。” CEO Phong Le补刀更直接: “当出售比特币对公司有利时,我们就会出售。 我们不会袖手旁观,只是说‘我们永远不会卖掉比特币’。” 他甚至说:“我们是加密经济的摩根大通,卖1000枚比特币还是840000枚,在我看来根本不值得讨论。” 看看“值得讨论”的是什么: 第二财季净亏损82亿美元。 股价从400多美元跌到94美元左右。 今年跌了40%,过去12个月跌了70%。 82亿亏损。70%跌幅。400跌到94。 然后你告诉我“永远不要卖”? 这1638枚BTC卖的钱去哪了? 一半付优先股股息——年化12%的股息,不付不行。 另一半回购打折的优先股。 Saylor的个人信仰一分钱没少。Strategy的资产负债表在流血。 所以我的结论很简单: 个人信仰归个人信仰,上市公司归上市公司。 Saylor的个人钱包和Strategy的资产负债表,是两回事。 他说“卖肾也要拿住BTC”——那是让你卖肾。 他自己一枚没卖。 公司该卖就卖,该亏就亏,该跌就跌。 别把KOL的鸡汤当成上市公司的财报来读。 你的钱包里装的是你的钱。 Saylor的钱包里装的是他的钱。 Strategy的资产负债表上装的是股东的钱——包括你的。 看清楚再站队。$BTC $MSTR $XMSTR #MSTR再卖1638枚比特币,规模腰斩
挖矿的小羊
挖矿的小羊
50 billion has arrived, but Amazon may not get a penny back Brothers and sisters, let me tell you something. On July 31, Amazon quietly disclosed a line in its 10-Q: it has completed a total investment of 50 billion USD in OpenAI. 50 billion. Not 5 billion, not 50 billion. 50 billion USD. What does that mean? Enough to buy two Coinbase and still have some left. But the story is not that simple. How was the money given? 15 billion was invested in Q1, 13.7 billion in Q2, and 21.3 billion after the reporting period. Three payments, three stages, all in place. And note— the originally set trigger conditions were not met at all. The originally agreed "OpenAI completes IPO" or "achieves major AI breakthrough" did not happen. Amazon still transferred the money. Why? Because in April this year, OpenAI and Microsoft renegotiated the cloud contract. Microsoft previously almost monopolized OpenAI's cloud services and even considered suing Amazon. With the contract renegotiated, AWS finally got a chance to enter. 50 billion arrived, in exchange for AWS getting the opportunity to provide cloud services to OpenAI. Amazon holds Series C preferred shares, about 5% ownership. Preferred shares sound fancy, right? They can only be converted into common stock after OpenAI completes an IPO or other liquidity events. After the IPO, there is also a customary lock-up period, so shares cannot be sold immediately. In other words, this 50 billion is currently just an "IOU." As long as OpenAI doesn't go public, Amazon won't get liquidity. The question is: when will OpenAI go public? Originally said by the end of this year. The IPO application was secretly submitted in June. But the latest news is—it may be postponed to next year. Insiders say, "The timing for going public is premature," reasoning that "many strategic goals are easier to advance as a private company." Translation: Going public now might expose some secrets. Expose what secrets? OpenAI's revenue in Q1 2026 is 5.7 billion USD. Sounds okay, right? Cash burn in the same period is 3.7 billion USD. Non-GAAP loss is 6.9 billion USD. For every 1 dollar earned, 1.22 dollars are lost. Last year's net loss was 38.5 billion USD, eight times that of 2024. And OpenAI promises to spend 100 billion USD on AWS over the next eight years. Invested 50 billion, in return for 100 billion cloud orders. On paper, it looks like a profit. But the problem is—what does a company that loses 1.22 dollars for every 1 dollar earned use to pay that 100 billion? Even more painful is the current state of the entire AI circle. The four giants—Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Meta—will have combined capital expenditures approaching 750 billion USD in 2026. An increase of over 60% compared to last year. And the direct revenue of the entire generative AI industry? It simply cannot fill this gap. Some analyses say this kind of "investment-consumption loop" is amplifying the AI boom narrative. You invest in me, I rent your cloud, you record revenue, I record expenses—the money goes in a circle and returns to the starting point. So is Amazon's 50 billion a bet or a bubble? The bet side says: 100 billion cloud orders over eight years, Trainium chips locking 2 gigawatts of capacity, AWS Q2 revenue up 36.7% year-over-year—worth it! The bubble side says: OpenAI is still losing heavily, IPO is far away, preferred shares cannot be cashed out, 50 billion is just a "long-term lottery ticket." My view? The answer is not how much was invested, but whether the 100 billion can be realized as real cash income. If OpenAI's computing power demand is real and sustainable, this 50 billion is one of the smartest strategic investments in history. If the AI bubble bursts and OpenAI's cloud orders shrink— then this 50 billion is the most expensive "cloud membership fee" in history. $OPENAI $AMZN $XAMZN #亚马逊向OpenAI投500亿美元:押注还是泡沫

Disclaimer: OKX Orbit content is provided for informational purposes only. Learn more

Replies

No comments yet. Be the first to reply!